E.g. “Yamaha Kodiak”, “Can-Am Outlander”, “Kawasaki Brute Force”
3 of 3 selected:
Kazuma Falcon 110×
Arctic Cat 300 2X4×
Kazuma Dingo 250×
Key Specs at a Glance
Engine
107cc / Unknown
280cc / 17.09
249cc / Unknown
Full Specifications
| × Remove | × Remove | × Remove |
|---|
| Engine Spec |
|---|
| Engine Detail | 4-stroke, 1-cylinder | 280cc, Air- and oil-cooled, 4-stroke SOHC ✓ | 4-stroke, 1-cylinder |
|---|
| Racks and Payload |
|---|
| Rack Capacity Front (Kg / Lbs.) | – | 45 / 100 ✓ | – |
|---|
| Dimensions and Weight |
|---|
| Wheelbase (mm / in.) | – | 1270 / 50 ✓ | – |
|---|
| Ground Clearance (mm / in.) | – | 210 / 8.25 ✓ | – |
|---|
| Suspension |
|---|
| Rear Travel (mm / in.) | – | Unknown / 6.5 | – |
|---|
| Suspension - Front Travel (mm / in.) | – | 165 / 6.5 ✓ | – |
|---|
| Engine Spec |
|---|
| Engine Valves | – | SOHC | – |
|---|
| Performance |
|---|
| Torque (Nm) | 7.3 Nm @ 6,000 rpm | – | 17 Nm @ 6,500 rpm ✓ |
|---|
| Power Output(hp in Kw) | 6.973 hp (5.2 kW) @ 7,100 rpm | – | 19.85 hp (14.8 kW) @ 8,500 rpm |
|---|
| Seats |
|---|
| Seat Height (mm / in.) | 787 / 31 ✓ | – | 808 / 31.8 |
|---|
| Fuel |
|---|
| Fuel Tank Capacity (l / gal.) | 5 / 1.2 | 18 / 4.75 ✓ | 5 / 1.2 |
|---|
| Tires and Rims |
|---|
| Tires Rear | 19 x 10 x 8 | 25 x 10-12 ✓ | 22 x 10 x 10 |
|---|
| Tires Front | 19 x 7 x 8 | 23 x 8-12 | 23 x 7 x 10 |
|---|
| Racks and Payload |
|---|
| Rack Capacity Rear (Kg / Lbs.) | – | 91 / 200 ✓ | – |
|---|
| Transmission (Gearbox) and Final Drive |
|---|
| Final Drive | Chain 2x4 | – | Chain 4x4 ✓ |
|---|
| Dimensions and Weight |
|---|
| Height (mm / in.) | 864 / 34 ✓ | 1143 / 45 | 1118 / 44 |
|---|
| Width (mm / in.) | 838 / 33 ✓ | 1124 / 44.25 | 914 / 36 |
|---|
| Length (mm / in.) | 1473 / 58 ✓ | 2019 / 79.5 | 1499 / 59 |
|---|
| Suspension |
|---|
| Suspension Rear | Mono shock | Fully independent w/6.5" of travel | Mono shock |
|---|
| Front Suspension | Shocks, single A-arm | Fully independent w/6.5" of travel | Shocks with dual A-arms |
|---|
| Brakes |
|---|
| Brakes Rear | Drum | Disc | Disc |
|---|
| Brakes Front | Drum | Disc | Drum |
|---|
| Engine Spec |
|---|
| Ignition | 12V, CDI | – | 12V, CDI |
|---|
| Engine Cylinders | single-cylinder | – | single-cylinder |
|---|
| Engine Cooling | Air / Oil-Cooled | Air and Oil-cooled | Water-Cooled |
|---|
| Engine Type | 4-stroke | 4-stroke | 4-stroke |
|---|
| Engine Capacity (cc / Ci ) | 107cc / Unknown | 280cc / 17.09 ✓ | 249cc / Unknown |
|---|
| Dimensions and Weight |
|---|
| Dry Weight (Kg / Lbs.) | 128 / 282 ✓ | 249 / 550 | 259 / 572 |
|---|
| Towing |
|---|
| Towing Capacity (Kg / Lbs.) | – | 386 / 850 ✓ | – |
|---|
Clear all & start over
Pros & Cons
✓ Pros
- Lightest of the group — easier to manoeuvre
- Independent front suspension for better ride comfort
- Lower seat height — more accessible for shorter riders
✗ Cons
- Smaller engine than the 2002 Arctic Cat 300 2X4
✓ Pros
- Largest engine in this comparison (280cccc)
- Highest rated towing capacity (386kg)
- Best ground clearance — handles rough terrain well
- Independent front suspension for better ride comfort
✗ Cons
- Heavier than the 2007 Kazuma Falcon 110
✓ Pros
- Independent front suspension for better ride comfort
- 4WD capable — better traction in mud, sand and steep terrain
✗ Cons
- Smaller engine than the 2002 Arctic Cat 300 2X4
- Heavier than the 2007 Kazuma Falcon 110
- Drum brakes on front — less stopping power than disc
Comparing 2007 Kazuma Falcon 110 vs 2002 Arctic Cat 300 2X4 vs 2007 Kazuma Dingo 250 — Common Questions
Which has the most powerful engine?
The 2002 Arctic Cat 300 2X4 has the largest displacement at 280cccc, making it the most powerful in this comparison. A larger engine generally means more torque for towing and off-road work.
Which quad is the lightest?
The 2007 Kazuma Falcon 110 is the lightest at 128kg (dry weight). A lighter quad is easier to manoeuvre on trails and simpler to recover if stuck.
Which is best for farm work and towing?
For heavy farm use the 2002 Arctic Cat 300 2X4 has the highest towing capacity at 386kg. For general farm duties any quad with 4WD and a towing rating above 400kg is suitable for light implements, spray rigs and game-reserve work.
Which has the better suspension?
Independent front suspension (A-Arm or IFS) absorbs bumps better than solid-axle designs and improves handling on uneven terrain. Check the Suspension category in the full table above to compare front and rear travel for each model.
Which is the easiest to ride?
CVT automatic transmission is easiest for beginners — there is no gear-changing or clutch to manage. A lower seat height also makes a quad more accessible for shorter riders. Check the Transmission and Seat Height rows in the table above.
Advertisement