E.g. “Yamaha Kodiak”, “Can-Am Outlander”, “Kawasaki Brute Force”
2 of 3 selected:
Honda TRX 250×
Arctic Cat 250 2X4×
Key Specs at a Glance
Engine
229cc / Unknown
246cc / 15.01
Full Specifications
| × Remove | × Remove |
|---|
| Engine Spec |
|---|
| Engine Detail | 229cc, Air Cooled, OHV sideways mounted, single cylinder, 4-Stroke ✓ | 4-stroke SOHC |
|---|
| Racks and Payload |
|---|
| Rack Capacity Front (Kg / Lbs.) | – | 45 / 100 ✓ |
|---|
| Suspension |
|---|
| Rear Travel (mm / in.) | – | 165 / 6.5 ✓ |
|---|
| Suspension - Front Travel (mm / in.) | – | 165 / 6.5 ✓ |
|---|
| Engine Spec |
|---|
| Engine Valves | – | SOHC |
|---|
| Seats |
|---|
| Seat Height (mm / in.) | 777 / 30.6 ✓ | – |
|---|
| Fuel |
|---|
| Fuel Tank Capacity (l / gal.) | 9 / 2.4 | 18 / 4.8 ✓ |
|---|
| Tires and Rims |
|---|
| Tires Rear | 22 x 10-9 | 24 x 9-12 ✓ |
|---|
| Tires Front | 22 x 7-11 | 23 x 8-12 ✓ |
|---|
| Dimensions and Weight |
|---|
| Dry Weight (Kg / Lbs.) | 180 / 397.0 ✓ | 240.4 / 530 |
|---|
| Wheelbase (mm / in.) | 1130 / 44.5 ✓ | 1270 / 50 |
|---|
| Ground Clearance (mm / in.) | 152 / 6.0 | 211 / 8.3 ✓ |
|---|
| Racks and Payload |
|---|
| Rack Capacity Rear (Kg / Lbs.) | – | 91 / 200 ✓ |
|---|
| Dimensions and Weight |
|---|
| Height (mm / in.) | 1054 / 41.5 ✓ | 1143 / 45 |
|---|
| Length (mm / in.) | 1793 / 70.6 ✓ | 2019 / 79.5 |
|---|
| Suspension |
|---|
| Suspension Rear | Swingarm with single shock, 4.9" of travel | Double A-arm FIS, Travel 6.5 in. |
|---|
| Front Suspension | Double wishbone, 5.1" of travel | Double A-arm, Travel 6.5 in. |
|---|
| Brakes |
|---|
| Brakes Rear | Sealed mechanical drum | Disc |
|---|
| Brakes Front | Dual hydraulic drum | Disc |
|---|
| Engine Spec |
|---|
| Ignition | CD with electronic advance | – |
|---|
| Bore Stroke(mm) | 68.5mm x 62.2mm | – |
|---|
| Engine Cylinders | single-cylinder | – |
|---|
| Engine Cooling | air-cooled | Air / Oil-Cooled |
|---|
| Engine Type | 4-Stroke | 4-stroke |
|---|
| Engine Capacity (cc / Ci ) | 229cc / Unknown | 246cc / 15.01 ✓ |
|---|
| Dimensions and Weight |
|---|
| Width (mm / in.) | 1034 / 40.7 ✓ | 1143 / 45 |
|---|
| Towing |
|---|
| Towing Capacity (Kg / Lbs.) | – | 386 / 850 ✓ |
|---|
Clear all & start over
Pros & Cons
✓ Pros
- Lightest of the group — easier to manoeuvre
- Lower seat height — more accessible for shorter riders
✗ Cons
- Smaller engine than the 2003 Arctic Cat 250 2X4
✓ Pros
- Largest engine in this comparison (246cccc)
- Highest rated towing capacity (386kg)
- Best ground clearance — handles rough terrain well
- Independent front suspension for better ride comfort
✗ Cons
- Heavier than the 2000 Honda TRX 250
Comparing 2000 Honda TRX 250 vs 2003 Arctic Cat 250 2X4 — Common Questions
Which has the most powerful engine?
The 2003 Arctic Cat 250 2X4 has the largest displacement at 246cccc, making it the most powerful in this comparison. A larger engine generally means more torque for towing and off-road work.
Which quad is the lightest?
The 2000 Honda TRX 250 is the lightest at 180kg (dry weight). A lighter quad is easier to manoeuvre on trails and simpler to recover if stuck.
Which is best for farm work and towing?
For heavy farm use the 2003 Arctic Cat 250 2X4 has the highest towing capacity at 386kg. For general farm duties any quad with 4WD and a towing rating above 400kg is suitable for light implements, spray rigs and game-reserve work.
Which has the better suspension?
Independent front suspension (A-Arm or IFS) absorbs bumps better than solid-axle designs and improves handling on uneven terrain. Check the Suspension category in the full table above to compare front and rear travel for each model.
Which is the easiest to ride?
CVT automatic transmission is easiest for beginners — there is no gear-changing or clutch to manage. A lower seat height also makes a quad more accessible for shorter riders. Check the Transmission and Seat Height rows in the table above.
Advertisement